[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14573?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16061523#comment-16061523
 ] 

Steve Loughran edited comment on HADOOP-14573 at 6/23/17 9:34 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------------

HADOOP-11573: patch 001. fix log capture regression. add better assertion 
reporting, then move to commons log capture, 

Testing: ran these failing tests manually, then applied patch to the 
HADOOP-14553 branch and all its tests completed; azure ireland


was (Author: [email protected]):
HADOOP-11573: patch 001. fix log capture regression. add better assertion 
reporting, then move to commons log capture, 

Testing: ran these failing tests manually, then applied patch to the 
HADOOP-14553 branch and all its tests completed

> regression: Azure tests which capture logs failing with move to SLF4J
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-14573
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14573
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: fs/azure, test
>    Affects Versions: 2.9.0
>            Reporter: Steve Loughran
>         Attachments: HADOOP-14573-001.patch
>
>
> The test {{TestNativeAzureFileSystemClientLogging}} is failing; with some 
> extra diagnostics it implies that the log isn't being captured.
> This test is primarily about verifying that things get logged, grabbing the 
> log and then looking for the presence/absence of log output.
> This makes it brittle to: changes in log output, log messages, and here: log 
> wiring.
> Do we need to retain this test at all? If yes,then log capture needs to be 
> looked again (HADOOP-13470 covers its past). If no: delete and let's not 
> worry about it.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to