[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14563?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16067357#comment-16067357
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-14563:
------------------------------------

| (/) *{color:green}+1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue}  3m 
13s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green}  0m  
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test 
files. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 13m 
26s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 15m  
7s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green}  0m 
34s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  1m 
14s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  1m 
36s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 
54s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green}  0m 
49s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 12m 
30s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 12m 
30s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:orange}-0{color} | {color:orange} checkstyle {color} | {color:orange}  
0m 32s{color} | {color:orange} hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common: The patch 
generated 20 new + 10 unchanged - 0 fixed = 30 total (was 10) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green}  1m  
1s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green}  0m 
 0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green}  1m 
39s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green}  0m 
46s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green}  7m 
52s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-common in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green}  0m 
27s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings. 
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 63m 19s{color} | 
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker |  Image:yetus/hadoop:14b5c93 |
| JIRA Issue | HADOOP-14563 |
| JIRA Patch URL | 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12874960/HADOOP-14563.patch |
| Optional Tests |  asflicense  compile  javac  javadoc  mvninstall  mvnsite  
unit  findbugs  checkstyle  |
| uname | Linux 1710a3be6784 4.4.0-43-generic #63-Ubuntu SMP Wed Oct 12 
13:48:03 UTC 2016 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/hadoop/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh 
|
| git revision | trunk / 990aa34 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_131 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
| checkstyle | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/12652/artifact/patchprocess/diff-checkstyle-hadoop-common-project_hadoop-common.txt
 |
|  Test Results | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/12652/testReport/ |
| modules | C: hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common U: 
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common |
| Console output | 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/12652/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.5.0-SNAPSHOT   http://yetus.apache.org |


This message was automatically generated.



> LoadBalancingKMSClientProvider#warmUpEncryptedKeys swallows IOException
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-14563
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14563
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.8.1
>            Reporter: Rushabh S Shah
>            Assignee: Rushabh S Shah
>         Attachments: HADOOP-14563.patch
>
>
> TestAclsEndToEnd is failing consistently in HADOOP-14521.
> The reason behind it is LoadBalancingKMSClientProvider#warmUpEncryptedKeys 
> swallows IOException while KMSClientProvider#warmUpEncryptedKeys throws all 
> the way back to createEncryptionZone and creation of EZ fails.
> Following are the relevant piece of code snippets.
>  {code:title=KMSClientProvider.java|borderStyle=solid}
>   @Override
>   public void warmUpEncryptedKeys(String... keyNames)
>       throws IOException {
>     try {
>       encKeyVersionQueue.initializeQueuesForKeys(keyNames);
>     } catch (ExecutionException e) {
>       throw new IOException(e);
>     }
>   }
> {code}
>  {code:title=LoadBalancingKMSClientProvider.java|borderStyle=solid}
>    // This request is sent to all providers in the load-balancing group
>   @Override
>   public void warmUpEncryptedKeys(String... keyNames) throws IOException {
>     for (KMSClientProvider provider : providers) {
>       try {
>         provider.warmUpEncryptedKeys(keyNames);
>       } catch (IOException ioe) {
>         LOG.error(
>             "Error warming up keys for provider with url"
>             + "[" + provider.getKMSUrl() + "]", ioe);
>       }
>     }
>   }
> {code}
> In HADOOP-14521, I intend to always instantiate 
> LoadBalancingKMSClientProvider even if there is only one provider so that the 
> retries can applied at only one place.
> We need to decide whether we want to fail in both the case or continue.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to