Sean Busbey commented on HADOOP-14089:

yeah, the test catches the problem this jira was filed against. I need to do a 
pass on which of them need to be relocated and which are fine

> Shaded Hadoop client runtime includes non-shaded classes
> --------------------------------------------------------
>                 Key: HADOOP-14089
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14089
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha2
>            Reporter: David Phillips
>            Assignee: Sean Busbey
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: HADOOP-14089.WIP.0.patch
> The jar includes things like {{assets}}, {{okio}}, {{javax/annotation}}, 
> {{javax/ws}}, {{mozilla}}, etc.
> An easy way to verify this is to look at the contents of the jar:
> {code}
> jar tf hadoop-client-runtime-xxx.jar | sort | grep -v '^org/apache/hadoop'
> {code}
> For standard dependencies, such as the JSR 305 {{javax.annotation}} or JAX-RS 
> {{javax.ws}}, it makes sense for those to be normal dependencies in the POM 
> -- they are standard, so version conflicts shouldn't be a problem. The JSR 
> 305 annotations can be {{<optional>true</optional>}} since they aren't needed 
> at runtime (this is what Guava does).

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to