[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16118971#comment-16118971
]
Sean Busbey commented on HADOOP-14089:
--------------------------------------
yeah, the test catches the problem this jira was filed against. I need to do a
pass on which of them need to be relocated and which are fine
> Shaded Hadoop client runtime includes non-shaded classes
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-14089
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14089
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha2
> Reporter: David Phillips
> Assignee: Sean Busbey
> Priority: Critical
> Attachments: HADOOP-14089.WIP.0.patch
>
>
> The jar includes things like {{assets}}, {{okio}}, {{javax/annotation}},
> {{javax/ws}}, {{mozilla}}, etc.
> An easy way to verify this is to look at the contents of the jar:
> {code}
> jar tf hadoop-client-runtime-xxx.jar | sort | grep -v '^org/apache/hadoop'
> {code}
> For standard dependencies, such as the JSR 305 {{javax.annotation}} or JAX-RS
> {{javax.ws}}, it makes sense for those to be normal dependencies in the POM
> -- they are standard, so version conflicts shouldn't be a problem. The JSR
> 305 annotations can be {{<optional>true</optional>}} since they aren't needed
> at runtime (this is what Guava does).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
