[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16176718#comment-16176718
 ] 

Chris Douglas commented on HADOOP-14897:
----------------------------------------

Thanks [~templedf]. This was filed neutrally, in case there are really 
compelling reasons for the requirement.

[[email protected]], you raised this in HADOOP-13714. I agree that 
patch versions should, except when addressing security vulnerabilities or other 
"must fix" issues, remain stable between patch releases. Given that our major 
releases tend to be long-lived, what would be a reasonable policy for native 
deps in minor releases? Is there a set of standards used by packagers we could 
adopt?

If our compatibility guidelines are setting users' expectations, I hesitate to 
promise more than best-effort, here.

> Loosen compatibility guidelines for native dependencies
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-14897
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14897
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: documentation, native
>            Reporter: Chris Douglas
>            Assignee: Daniel Templeton
>            Priority: Blocker
>
> Within a major version, the compatibility guidelines forbid raising the 
> minimum required version of any native dependency or tool required to build 
> native components.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to