[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8690?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16185035#comment-16185035
]
Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-8690:
-----------------------------------
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m
18s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 1 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 14m
7s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 15m
29s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
36s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
4s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
10m 33s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
29s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
51s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 0m
42s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 12m
6s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 12m
6s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 0m
40s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
10s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
8m 44s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing our
client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 1m
50s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 0m
56s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 8m 55s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-common in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
29s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black} 80m 3s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.ha.TestZKFailoverController |
| | hadoop.security.TestKDiag |
| | hadoop.net.TestDNS |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Image:yetus/hadoop:71bbb86 |
| JIRA Issue | HADOOP-8690 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12879359/HADOOP-8690.01.patch |
| Optional Tests | asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite
unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux 4eaf41b0880f 3.13.0-117-generic #164-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 7
11:05:26 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/hadoop/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh
|
| git revision | trunk / ca669f9 |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_144 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
| unit |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/13402/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hadoop-common-project_hadoop-common.txt
|
| Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/13402/testReport/ |
| modules | C: hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common U:
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common |
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/13402/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.6.0-SNAPSHOT http://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
> Shell may remove a file without going to trash even if skipTrash is not
> enabled
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-8690
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8690
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0-alpha
> Reporter: Eli Collins
> Assignee: Andras Bokor
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: HADOOP-8690.01.patch
>
>
> Delete.java contains the following comment:
> {noformat}
> // TODO: if the user wants the trash to be used but there is any
> // problem (ie. creating the trash dir, moving the item to be deleted,
> // etc), then the path will just be deleted because moveToTrash returns
> // false and it falls thru to fs.delete. this doesn't seem right
> {noformat}
> If Trash#moveToAppropriateTrash returns false FsShell will delete the path
> even if skipTrash is not enabled. The comment isn't quite right as some of
> these failure scenarios result in exceptions not a false return value, and in
> the case of an exception we don't unconditionally delete the path.
> TrashPolicy#moveToTrash states that it only returns false if the item is
> already in the trash or trash is disabled, and the expected behavior for
> these cases is to just delete the path. However
> TrashPolicyDefault#moveToTrash also returns false if there's a problem
> creating the trash directory, so for this case I think we should throw an
> exception rather than return false (and delete the path bypassing trash).
> I also question the behavior of just deleting when the item is already in the
> trash as it may have changed since previously put in the trash and not been
> checkpointed yet. Seems like in this case we should move it to trash but with
> a file name suffix.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
