[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14951?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16208012#comment-16208012
]
Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-14951:
------------------------------------
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 17m
7s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Prechecks {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} @author {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not contain any @author tags. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} test4tests {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch appears to include 2 new or modified test
files. {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} trunk Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
17s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for branch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 16m
41s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 19m
6s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 2m
18s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 2m
5s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
16m 22s{color} | {color:green} branch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m
27s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m
17s{color} | {color:green} trunk passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Patch Compile Tests {color} ||
| {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} mvndep {color} | {color:blue} 0m
17s{color} | {color:blue} Maven dependency ordering for patch {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvninstall {color} | {color:green} 1m
11s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} compile {color} | {color:green} 10m
54s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javac {color} | {color:green} 10m
54s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} checkstyle {color} | {color:green} 2m
4s{color} | {color:green} root: The patch generated 0 new + 97 unchanged - 17
fixed = 97 total (was 114) {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} mvnsite {color} | {color:green} 1m
35s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} whitespace {color} | {color:green} 0m
0s{color} | {color:green} The patch has no whitespace issues. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} shadedclient {color} | {color:green}
11m 33s{color} | {color:green} patch has no errors when building and testing
our client artifacts. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} findbugs {color} | {color:green} 2m
48s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} javadoc {color} | {color:green} 1m
24s{color} | {color:green} the patch passed {color} |
|| || || || {color:brown} Other Tests {color} ||
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} unit {color} | {color:green} 3m
6s{color} | {color:green} hadoop-kms in the patch passed. {color} |
| {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} unit {color} | {color:red} 94m 50s{color}
| {color:red} hadoop-hdfs in the patch failed. {color} |
| {color:green}+1{color} | {color:green} asflicense {color} | {color:green} 0m
40s{color} | {color:green} The patch does not generate ASF License warnings.
{color} |
| {color:black}{color} | {color:black} {color} | {color:black}224m 59s{color} |
{color:black} {color} |
\\
\\
|| Reason || Tests ||
| Failed junit tests | hadoop.hdfs.server.datanode.TestDataNodeVolumeFailure |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Docker | Image:yetus/hadoop:0de40f0 |
| JIRA Issue | HADOOP-14951 |
| JIRA Patch URL |
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12892627/HADOOP-14951-4.patch |
| Optional Tests | asflicense compile javac javadoc mvninstall mvnsite
unit shadedclient findbugs checkstyle |
| uname | Linux 86fa6c298859 3.13.0-117-generic #164-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 7
11:05:26 UTC 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux |
| Build tool | maven |
| Personality | /testptch/hadoop/patchprocess/precommit/personality/provided.sh
|
| git revision | trunk / 31ebccc |
| Default Java | 1.8.0_144 |
| findbugs | v3.1.0-RC1 |
| unit |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/13530/artifact/patchprocess/patch-unit-hadoop-hdfs-project_hadoop-hdfs.txt
|
| Test Results |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/13530/testReport/ |
| modules | C: hadoop-common-project/hadoop-kms hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs
U: . |
| Console output |
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/13530/console |
| Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.6.0-SNAPSHOT http://yetus.apache.org |
This message was automatically generated.
> KMSACL implementation is not configurable
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-14951
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14951
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: kms
> Reporter: Zsombor Gegesy
> Labels: key-management, kms
> Attachments:
> 0001-HADOOP-14951-Make-the-KMSACLs-implementation-customi.patch,
> 0001-Make-the-KMSACLs-implementation-customizable-with-an.patch,
> HADOOP-14951-3-Make-the-KMSACLs-implementation-customi.patch,
> HADOOP-14951-4.patch
>
>
> Currently, it is not possible to customize KMS's key management, if KMSACLs
> behaviour is not enough. If an external key management solution is used, that
> would need a higher level API, where it can decide, if the given operation is
> allowed, or not.
> For this to achieve, it would be a solution, to introduce a new interface,
> which could be implemented by KMSACLs - and also other KMS - and a new
> configuration point could be added, where the actual interface implementation
> could be specified.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
