[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16340431#comment-16340431
 ] 

Bharat Viswanadham edited comment on HADOOP-9747 at 1/27/18 12:41 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi [~daryn]

Thank You for the patch.

I am going through the patch, have some questions when I am trying to 
understand the code and also have some review comments.
 * In hasKerberosCredential methods, add user!=null check, as it might throw 
NPE, when user=null. So, the AppConfigEntry will have loginModule as 
OS_LOGIN_MODULE,
 * In case of loginuserfromSubject, as we pass params as null to 
doSubjectLogin, the configuration will be OS_SPECIFIC_LOGIN. So, in this case 
login fallbacks to Simple Auth login? Is this the expected behavior.

{code:java}
ArrayList<AppConfigurationEntry> entries = new ArrayList<>();
// login of external subject passes no params.  technically only
// existing credentials should be used but other components expect
// the login to succeed with local user fallback if no principal.
if (params == null || appName.equals(SIMPLE_CONFIG_NAME)) {
  entries.add(OS_SPECIFIC_LOGIN);
} {code}

 * renewTGT and refreshKrb5Config is not set in IBM_JAVA case, is there any 
reason for this?
 * @Test annotation is missing for tests in TestUGILoginFromKeytab.java
 * Following 3 methods perform login and update the static loginUser. It might 
make sense to add documentation that these update the global loginUser.
 getLoginUser, loginUserFromSubject and loginUserFromKeytab

I am still going through patch, and still reviewing test cases. Will update if 
I have more comments.


was (Author: bharatviswa):
Hi [~daryn]

Thank You for the patch.

I am going through the patch, have some questions when I am trying to 
understand the code and also have some review comments.
 * In hasKerberosCredential methods, add user!=null check, as it might throw 
NPE, when user=null.
 * In case of loginuserfromSubject, as we pass params as null to 
doSubjectLogin, the configuration will be OS_SPECIFIC_LOGIN. So, in this case 
login fallbacks to Simple Auth login? Is this the expected behavior.
 **  @Override
 public AppConfigurationEntry[] getAppConfigurationEntry(String appName) \{ 
ArrayList<AppConfigurationEntry> entries = new ArrayList<>(); // login of 
external subject passes no params. technically only // existing credentials 
should be used but other components expect // the login to succeed with local 
user fallback if no principal. if (params == null || 
appName.equals(SIMPLE_CONFIG_NAME)) \{ entries.add(OS_SPECIFIC_LOGIN); }
 ** So, the AppConfigEntry will have loginModule as OS_LOGIN_MODULE,
 * renewTGT and refreshKrb5Config is not set in IBM_JAVA case, is there any 
reason for this?
 * @Test annotation is missing for tests in TestUGILoginFromKeytab.java
 * Following 3 methods perform login and update the static loginUser. It might 
make sense to add documentation that these update the global loginUser.
 getLoginUser, loginUserFromSubject and loginUserFromKeytab

I am still going through patch, and still reviewing test cases. Will update if 
I have more comments.

> Reduce unnecessary UGI synchronization
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-9747
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9747
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: security
>    Affects Versions: 0.23.0, 2.0.0-alpha, 3.0.0-alpha1
>            Reporter: Daryn Sharp
>            Assignee: Daryn Sharp
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: HADOOP-9747-trunk-03.patch, HADOOP-9747-trunk.01.patch, 
> HADOOP-9747-trunk.02.patch, HADOOP-9747.2.branch-2.patch, 
> HADOOP-9747.2.trunk.patch, HADOOP-9747.branch-2.patch, HADOOP-9747.trunk.patch
>
>
> Jstacks of heavily loaded NNs show up to dozens of threads blocking in the 
> UGI.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to