[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15428?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16459191#comment-16459191
]
Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-15428:
-----------------------------------------
Actually I'm confused now. If the bucket has s3guard enabled, then yes, it
should be an error if this is set but the DDB table is there
I'll need to do some more CLI Experiments. What do others think?
[~lqjack]: while you are looking at S3Guard code,HADOOP-15430 has just
surfaced....
> s3guard bucket-info -unguarded will guard bucket if FS is set to do this
> automatically
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-15428
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15428
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: fs/s3
> Affects Versions: 3.1.0
> Reporter: Steve Loughran
> Priority: Major
>
> If you call hadoop s3guard bucket-info on a bucket where the fs is set to
> create a s3guard table on demand, then the DDB table is automatically
> created. As a result
> the {{bucket-info -unguarded}} option cannot be used, and the call has
> significant side effects (i.e. it can run up bills)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
