[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16711785#comment-16711785
]
Erik Krogen edited comment on HADOOP-15978 at 12/6/18 5:52 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------------
Hey Daryn, it's great to see this work being done. Do you have any performance
numbers you can share with this Netty implementation vs. the existing RPC
implementation? It would be nice to see the comparison without encryption and
JavaSSL vs. Netty TLS.
One other question. Assuming TLS is not enabled, IIUC, this will be fully
backwards compatible, allowing an old client to talk to new Netty RPC server,
correct? Netty on both ends will only be required if TLS is used?
was (Author: xkrogen):
Hey Daryn, it's great to see this work being done. Do you have any performance
numbers you can share with this Netty implementation vs. the existing RPC
implementation? It would be nice to see the comparison without encryption and
JavaSSL vs. Netty TLS.
> Add Netty support to the RPC server
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-15978
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15978
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: ipc, security
> Reporter: Daryn Sharp
> Assignee: Daryn Sharp
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: HADOOP-15978.patch
>
>
> Adding Netty will allow later using a native TLS transport layer with much
> better performance than that offered by Java's SSLEngine.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
