[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16722265#comment-16722265
 ] 

Bolke de Bruin commented on HADOOP-15996:
-----------------------------------------

Gotcha.

I think it makes sense to make the configuration in 
KerberosAuthenticationHandler. Can we be sure KerberosName is not used 
directly? (I did a quick scan of Hive it uses UGI so I assume it doesn't use it 
directly then? I wasn't thorough though)

The reasons why HADOOP-12751 was not configurable in the first place was due to 
the fact KerberosName does not have any awareness of configuration.

 

> Plugin interface to support more complex usernames in Hadoop
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-15996
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15996
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: security
>            Reporter: Eric Yang
>            Priority: Major
>
> Hadoop does not allow support of @ character in username in recent security 
> mailing list vote to revert HADOOP-12751.  Hadoop auth_to_local rule must 
> match to authorize user to login to Hadoop cluster.  This design does not 
> work well in multi-realm environment where identical username between two 
> realms do not map to the same user.  There is also possibility that lossy 
> regex can incorrectly map users.  In the interest of supporting multi-realms, 
> it maybe preferred to pass principal name without rewrite to uniquely 
> distinguish users.  This jira is to revisit if Hadoop can support full 
> principal names without rewrite and provide a plugin to override Hadoop's 
> default implementation of auth_to_local for multi-realm use case.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to