[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16788759#comment-16788759
]
Steve Loughran edited comment on HADOOP-16175 at 3/9/19 5:53 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
We started off with this, but the lack of timely releases of the JAR, shading
problems meant we just gave up trying to keep it going: HADOOP-14918 was the
cleanup
For testing we have the in-memory one, for production. DDB. The good news,
Amazon's "on demand" DDB option does work, so you can now have isolated tables
for each store and not pay for idle time
was (Author: ste...@apache.org):
We started off with this, but the lack of timely releases of HADOOP-14918 meant
we just gave up trying to keep it going.
For testing we have the in-memory one, for production. DDB. The good news,
Amazon's "on demand" DDB option does work, so you can now have isolated tables
for each store and not pay for idle time
> S3Guard to add DynamoDBLocal Support
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-16175
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16175
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: fs/s3
> Affects Versions: 3.2.0
> Reporter: lqjacklee
> Assignee: lqjacklee
> Priority: Major
>
> DynamoDB Local
> ([https://docs.aws.amazon.com/amazondynamodb/latest/developerguide/DynamoDBLocal.html)]
> provide the function that the user/developer can run the local environment
> without depending on AWS.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
