[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15038?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16790120#comment-16790120
]
wujinhu edited comment on HADOOP-15038 at 3/12/19 1:43 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------
Yes，[~ste...@apache.org] I am writing and testing ms for OSS connector, we will
continue this process when HADOOP-15619 is ready.
was (Author: wujinhu):
Yes，[~ste...@apache.org] I am writing and testing ms for OSS connector, we will
continue this process until HADOOP-15619 is ready.
> Abstract MetadataStore in S3Guard into a common module.
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-15038
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15038
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: fs
> Affects Versions: 3.2.0, 2.9.2, 3.0.3, 3.1.2
> Reporter: Genmao Yu
> Assignee: wujinhu
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: HADOOP-15038.001.patch
>
>
> Open this JIRA to discuss if we should move {{MetadataStore}} in {{S3Guard}}
> into a common module.
> Based on this work, other filesystem or object store can implement their own
> metastore for optimization (known issues like consistency problem and
> metadata operation performance). [~ste...@apache.org] and other guys have
> done many base and great works in {{S3Guard}}. It is very helpful to start
> work. I did some perf test in HADOOP-14098, and started related work for
> Aliyun OSS. Indeed there are still works to do for {{S3Guard}}, like
> metadata cache inconsistent with S3 and so on. It also will be a problem for
> other object store. However, we can do these works in parallel.
> [~ste...@apache.org] [~fabbri] [~drankye] Any suggestion is appreciated.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
