[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16838813#comment-16838813
]
Hudson commented on HADOOP-16161:
---------------------------------
SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build Hadoop-trunk-Commit #16545 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-trunk-Commit/16545/])
HADOOP-16161. NetworkTopology#getWeightUsingNetworkLocation return (inigoiri:
rev 389e640f0cc7d8528e9b4411457f04a528601c69)
* (edit)
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/net/NetworkTopology.java
* (edit)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/blockmanagement/TestDatanodeManager.java
* (edit)
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/net/TestNetworkTopology.java
> NetworkTopology#getWeightUsingNetworkLocation return unexpected result
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-16161
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16161
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: net
> Reporter: He Xiaoqiao
> Assignee: He Xiaoqiao
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 3.3.0
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-16161.001.patch, HADOOP-16161.002.patch,
> HADOOP-16161.003.patch, HADOOP-16161.004.patch, HADOOP-16161.005.patch,
> HADOOP-16161.006.patch, HADOOP-16161.007.patch, HADOOP-16161.008.patch,
> HADOOP-16161.009.patch
>
>
> Consider the following scenario:
> 1. there are 4 slaves and topology like:
> Rack: /IDC/RACK1
> hostname1
> hostname2
> Rack: /IDC/RACK2
> hostname3
> hostname4
> 2. Reader from hostname1, and calculate weight between reader and [hostname1,
> hostname3, hostname4] by #getWeight, and their corresponding values are
> [0,4,4]
> 3. Reader from client which is not in the topology, and in the same IDC but
> in none rack of the topology, and calculate weight between reader and
> [hostname1, hostname3, hostname4] by #getWeightUsingNetworkLocation, and
> their corresponding values are [2,2,2]
> 4. Other different Reader can get the similar results.
> The weight result for case #3 is obviously not the expected value, the truth
> is [4,4,4]. this issue may cause reader not really following arrange: local
> -> local rack -> remote rack.
> After dig the detailed implement, the root cause is
> #getWeightUsingNetworkLocation only calculate distance between Racks rather
> than hosts.
> I think we should add constant 2 to correct the weight of
> #getWeightUsingNetworkLocation.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
