[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7472?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13081970#comment-13081970
]
Kihwal Lee commented on HADOOP-7472:
------------------------------------
For Trunk, {{mvn clean install -Ptar -Ptest-patch}} was run.
Results :
Tests in error:
Tests run: 1334, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 6:58.706s
[INFO] Finished at: Tue Aug 09 17:21:52 CDT 2011
[INFO] Final Memory: 10M/52M
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following is the failed test, which also fails without this patch.
Running org.apache.hadoop.fs.TestFilterFileSystem
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.246 sec <<<
FAILURE!
The justification for missing test was given in previous comments. I see a
better chance of having a meaningful test in trunk than in 0.20-security. I
will file a separate Jira for potentially introducing new packages that enables
such a test.
> RPC client should deal with the IP address changes
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-7472
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7472
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: ipc
> Affects Versions: 0.20.205.0
> Reporter: Kihwal Lee
> Assignee: Kihwal Lee
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 0.20.205.0
>
> Attachments: addr_change_dfs-1.patch.txt,
> addr_change_dfs-2.patch.txt, addr_change_dfs-3.patch.txt,
> addr_change_dfs.patch.txt, addr_change_dfs_0_20s-1.patch.txt,
> addr_change_dfs_0_20s-2.patch.txt, addr_change_dfs_0_20s.patch.txt,
> addr_change_dfs_trunk-1.patch.txt, addr_change_dfs_trunk-2.patch.txt,
> addr_change_dfs_trunk-3.patch.txt, addr_change_dfs_trunk.patch.txt
>
>
> The current RPC client implementation and the client-side callers assume that
> the hostname-address mappings of servers never change. The resolved address
> is stored in an immutable InetSocketAddress object above/outside RPC, and the
> reconnect logic in the RPC Connection implementation also trusts the resolved
> address that was passed down.
> If the NN suffers a failure that requires migration, it may be started on a
> different node with a different IP address. In this case, even if the
> name-address mapping is updated in DNS, the cluster is stuck trying old
> address until the whole cluster is restarted.
> The RPC client-side should detect this situation and exit or try to recover.
> Updating ConnectionId within the Client implementation may get the system
> work for the moment, there always is a risk of the cached address:port become
> connectable again unintentionally. The real solution will be notifying upper
> layer of the address change so that they can re-resolve and retry or
> re-architecture the system as discussed in HDFS-34.
> For 0.20 lines, some type of compromise may be acceptable. For example, raise
> a custom exception for some well-defined high-impact upper layer to do
> re-resolve/retry, while other will have to restart. For TRUNK, the HA work
> will most likely determine what needs to be done. So this Jira won't cover
> the solutions for TRUNK.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
