[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16929292#comment-16929292
 ] 

Sahil Takiar commented on HADOOP-16569:
---------------------------------------

Hey [~Steven Rand], thanks for tagging me. Yeah, HADOOP-16371 would help here. 
I recently updated the PR for HADOOP-16371 - 
https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/970 and am working on running some 
additional testing, but review comments are welcome.

> improve TLS performance for NativeAzureFileSystem
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-16569
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16569
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Steven Rand
>            Priority: Major
>
> Several tickets have already discussed the performance issues of GCM ciphers 
> on jdk8 in relation to cloud connectors:
> * HADOOP-16050, HADOOP-16371 (s3a)
> * HADOOP-15669 (abfs)
> * HADOOP-15965 (adls)
> However, we haven't gotten around to fixing this for Azure Blob Store yet 
> (the wasbs scheme).
> It would be helpful to reuse the {{SSLSocketFactoryEx}} class that was added 
> in HADOOP-15669. The {{getInstrumentedContext}} method in 
> {{AzureNativeFileSystemStore}} can already mutate the connection to the blob 
> store and inject that socket factory, so it's not a hard change to make.
> This isn't necessarily blocked on HADOOP-16371, but it would  be helpful if 
> we merged that PR first, since it moves the custom {{SSLSocketFactory}} that 
> uses wildfly-openssl out of the code that's specific to ABFS and into a place 
> where the Azure Blob Store code can access it.
> Tagging [~stakiar] since you've been working on this for the other cloud 
> connectors



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.2#803003)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to