[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16581?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16935214#comment-16935214
 ] 

Masatake Iwasaki commented on HADOOP-16581:
-------------------------------------------

[~xkrogen] branch-2 build failed due to lambda left in the backported fix. 
{noformat}
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal 
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.1:testCompile 
(default-testCompile) on project hadoop-common: Compilation failure
[ERROR] 
/ext/srcs/hadoop-branch-2/hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/crypto/key/TestValueQueue.java:[67,33]
 lambda expressions are not supported in -source 1.7
[ERROR]   (use -source 8 or higher to enable lambda expressions)
{noformat}

> ValueQueue does not trigger an async refill when number of values falls below 
> watermark
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-16581
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16581
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: common, kms
>    Affects Versions: 2.7.4, 3.2.0
>            Reporter: Yuval Degani
>            Assignee: Yuval Degani
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 2.10.0, 3.3.0, 3.1.4, 3.2.2
>
>
> The ValueQueue facility was designed to cache EDEKs for KMS KeyProviders so 
> that EDEKs could be served quickly, while the cache is replenished in a 
> background thread.
> The existing code for triggering an asynchronous refill is only triggered 
> when a key queue becomes empty, rather than when it falls below the 
> configured watermark.
> This is a relatively minor fix in the main code, however, most of the tests 
> require some changes as they verify the previous unintended behavior.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to