[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Alejandro Abdelnur updated HADOOP-7507:
---------------------------------------

    Attachment: HADOOP-7507v4.patch

v4 patch.

Integrates Luke's suggestions.

I've checked with Matt regarding the exclusion of the Hostname tag, and he 
indicated that it is a good idea. His argument is that hostnames are case 
insensitive and different DNSes may have the host with different case and this 
could create shadow groups if a process starts getting a different case DNS 
name.

> jvm metrics all use the same namespace
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-7507
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7507
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: metrics
>    Affects Versions: 0.20.2
>            Reporter: Jeff Bean
>            Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur
>             Fix For: 0.23.0
>
>         Attachments: HADOOP-7507-v2.patch, HADOOP-7507v1.patch, 
> HADOOP-7507v3.patch, HADOOP-7507v4.patch, JvmMetrics.java, 
> hadoop-metrics.properties, screenshot-1.jpg
>
>
> Ganglia jvm metrics don't make sense because it's not clear which java 
> process the metrics refer to. In fact, all hadoop java processes running on a 
> node report their jvm metrics to the same namespace.
> The metrics are exposed by the "jvm" context in JvmMetrics.java. This leads 
> to confusing and nonsensical graphs in ganglia and maybe other monitoring 
> tools.
> One way to fix this is to make sure the process name is reported in the jvm 
> context, making it clear which process is associated with the context, and 
> separating out the jvm metrics per process.
> This is marked as an "incompatible change" because the fix provided removes 
> the JVM metrics and replaces it with process-specific metrics.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to