[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16686?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16968576#comment-16968576
]
Íñigo Goiri commented on HADOOP-16686:
--------------------------------------
Let's fix the 13 checkstyle issues from:
https://builds.apache.org/job/hadoop-multibranch/job/PR-1696/2/artifact/out/diff-checkstyle-hadoop-common-project_hadoop-common.txt
I think they all make sense and follow the spirit of the JIRA.
Regarding the PR, let's abandon it then.
> Review Writable Classes
> -----------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-16686
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16686
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: common
> Affects Versions: 3.2
> Reporter: David Mollitor
> Assignee: David Mollitor
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: HADOOP-16686.1.patch, HADOOP-16686.2.patch
>
>
> Based on my work in HADOOP-16678, I figured I'd look at some of the other
> {{Writeable}} classes. I wanted these looking good because they are so
> core/base to the Hadoop framework.
> Formatted the classes to remove checkstyle violations, and spiffed things up
> where I saw fit. This includes improving some {{equals}} and {{hashcode}}
> implementation. For example:
>
> [https://github.com/apache/hadoop/blob/trunk/hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/io/LongWritable.java#L66]
>
> [https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4045063/how-should-i-map-long-to-int-in-hashcode]
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
