[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17067969#comment-17067969
 ] 

Hudson commented on HADOOP-16939:
---------------------------------

SUCCESS: Integrated in Jenkins build Hadoop-trunk-Commit #18097 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-trunk-Commit/18097/])
HADOOP-16939 fs.s3a.authoritative.path should support multiple FS URIs (github: 
rev eaaaba12b142cfb8b392fb7a02dada0f5bcdedcc)
* (edit) 
hadoop-tools/hadoop-aws/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/s3a/S3AFileSystem.java
* (edit) 
hadoop-tools/hadoop-aws/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/s3a/s3guard/S3Guard.java
* (edit) 
hadoop-tools/hadoop-aws/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/s3a/ITestAuthoritativePath.java
* (edit) 
hadoop-tools/hadoop-aws/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/s3a/S3AUtils.java
* (add) 
hadoop-tools/hadoop-aws/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/s3a/s3guard/TestAuthoritativePath.java


> fs.s3a.authoritative.path should support multiple FS URIs
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-16939
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-16939
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: fs/s3
>    Affects Versions: 3.3.0
>            Reporter: Steve Loughran
>            Assignee: Steve Loughran
>            Priority: Major
>
> (This may have worked until we did recent changes to s3a path qualification)
> fs.s3a.authoritative.path was intended to support not just a list of paths, 
> but a list of URIs, so that you could explicitly list those paths which were 
> authoritative in specific buckets. 
> Parsing of the list in an FS instance must therefore discard all which are of 
> different URI authorities



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to