fengnanli commented on a change in pull request #2266:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/2266#discussion_r481691251
##########
File path:
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-rbf/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/federation/router/RouterAdminServer.java
##########
@@ -562,11 +595,35 @@ public GetDestinationResponse getDestination(
LOG.error("Cannot get location for {}: {}",
src, ioe.getMessage());
}
- if (nsIds.isEmpty() && !locations.isEmpty()) {
- String nsId = locations.get(0).getNameserviceId();
- nsIds.add(nsId);
+ return nsIds;
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * Verify the file exists in destination nameservices to avoid dangling
+ * mount points.
+ *
+ * @param entry the new mount points added, could be from add or update.
+ * @return destination nameservices where the file doesn't exist.
+ * @throws IOException
+ */
+ private List<String> verifyFileInDestinations(MountTable entry)
Review comment:
Yeah, I can add that.
This logic change will break a lot of current tests listed by yetus above.
What is a good practice here? I have two ideas in mind:
1) make the logic based on a command option when adding/updating mount
tables.
2) add mock (if possible) like what I did for TestRouterAdmin.java to fake
out the dirs in namenodes.
I like 2 since I think this should be the default check, what's your opinion?
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
