[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17205644#comment-17205644
 ] 

Michael Stack commented on HADOOP-17288:
----------------------------------------

{quote}Ideally if the downstream has to upgrade guava, then this patch has no 
meaning.
{quote}
+1
{quote}Then we might need to shade them as well? May be {{curator}} can be one 
of those.
{quote}
Yes. Unfortunately the tangles start to compound fast when the dependencies' 
dependency is also an hadoop dependency (and versions don't align). One thing 
to consider removing problem dependencies (like curator) if not heavily used. 
Thanks [~ayushtkn]

> Use shaded guava from thirdparty
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-17288
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17288
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Ayush Saxena
>            Assignee: Ayush Saxena
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 3.4.0
>
>          Time Spent: 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Use the shaded version of guava in hadoop-thirdparty



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to