steveloughran edited a comment on pull request #2584:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/2584#issuecomment-759582014


   I'm thinking we should be more ambitious in read policy than just "fadvise", 
because we can then use it as a declaration for the input streams to tune all 
their params, eg. buffer sizing, whether to do async prefetch. 
   
   Then we could allow stores to support not-just seek policies, but declare 
what you were planning to read, e.g. "parquet-bytebuffer", to mean "I'm reading 
parquet files through the bytebuffer positioned read API"
   
   ```
   openFile("s3a://datasets/set1/input.parquet).
     opt("fs.openfile.policy, "parquet-vectored, parquet,random")
    .build().get()
   ```
   
   
   example` opt(fs.openfile.read.policy, "parquet-vectored, parquet, random")`  
to mean "optimise for parquet for vectored IO, then generic vectored IO, then 
generic random IO". Store implementors would get to make their own decisions as 
to what to set based on profiling &c. We'd need the applications to set policy 
on `openFile()` -so would need to know what names to use. That we can discuss 
with them,  maybe by predefining some options which *may* be supported


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to