[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7557?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13126195#comment-13126195
 ] 

Sanjay Radia commented on HADOOP-7557:
--------------------------------------

> This is not a user extension point....
> ... like security that's used by all message encodings, why not use an 
> encoding-independent format in the header? ...

Essentially you are arguing that  IpcHeader does not need to be extensible and 
that *essentially* we should merge the "hrpc" header and the ipcHeader. I do 
believe it is missing the "protocolKind" field since there are 3 existing 
protocols (3 rpc engines) at the next layer. Hence if the header *had* been 
extensible in the past we would have been able to add the field easily in a 
backward compatible fashion.
                
> Make  IPC  header be extensible
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-7557
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7557
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Sanjay Radia
>            Assignee: Sanjay Radia
>         Attachments: HADOOP-7557.patch, IpcHeader.proto, ipcHeader1.patch, 
> ipcHeader2.patch
>
>


--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to