[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17330029#comment-17330029
 ] 

Viraj Jasani edited comment on HADOOP-17409 at 4/23/21, 6:52 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

[~ste...@apache.org] Is your proposal to remove S3Guard applicable to 3.4.0 
onwards or is it for next major release (4.0.0) onwards?

Thanks


was (Author: vjasani):
[~ste...@apache.org] Is your intention to remove S3Guard applicable to 3.4.0 
onwards or is it for next major release (4.0.0) onwards?

> Remove S3Guard - no longer needed
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-17409
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17409
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: fs/s3
>    Affects Versions: 3.3.0
>            Reporter: Steve Loughran
>            Priority: Major
>
> With Consistent S3, S3Guard is superfluous. 
> stop developing it and wean people off it as soon as they can.
> Then we can worry about what to do in the code. It has gradually insinuated 
> its way through the layers, especially things like multi-object delete 
> handling (see HADOOP-17244). Things would be a lot simpler without it



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to