zhuxiangyi commented on a change in pull request #3086:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/3086#discussion_r649727373
##########
File path:
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-rbf/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/federation/metrics/RBFMetrics.java
##########
@@ -165,11 +172,46 @@ public RBFMetrics(Router router) throws IOException {
// Initialize the cache for the DN reports
Configuration conf = router.getConfig();
- this.timeOut = conf.getTimeDuration(RBFConfigKeys.DN_REPORT_TIME_OUT,
- RBFConfigKeys.DN_REPORT_TIME_OUT_MS_DEFAULT, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
this.topTokenRealOwners = conf.getInt(
RBFConfigKeys.DFS_ROUTER_METRICS_TOP_NUM_TOKEN_OWNERS_KEY,
RBFConfigKeys.DFS_ROUTER_METRICS_TOP_NUM_TOKEN_OWNERS_KEY_DEFAULT);
+ // Initialize the cache for the DN reports
+ this.dnReportTimeOut = conf.getTimeDuration(
+ RBFConfigKeys.DN_REPORT_TIME_OUT,
+ RBFConfigKeys.DN_REPORT_TIME_OUT_MS_DEFAULT, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
+ long dnCacheExpire = conf.getTimeDuration(
+ RBFConfigKeys.DN_REPORT_CACHE_EXPIRE,
+ RBFConfigKeys.DN_REPORT_CACHE_EXPIRE_MS_DEFAULT,
TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
+ this.dnCache = CacheBuilder.newBuilder()
Review comment:
> RouterRpcServer has a similar cache, can we use that?
Yes we can use it.
NamesystemMetrics and NamenodeInfoMetrics will be stored in StateStore by
NamenodeBeanMetrics. It does not need to be stored, right? Is it better for us
to cache it in RBFMetrics.
` private void updateJMXParameters(
String address, NamenodeStatusReport report) {
try {
// TODO part of this should be moved to its own utility
getFsNamesystemMetrics(address, report);
getNamenodeInfoMetrics(address, report);
} catch (Exception e) {
LOG.error("Cannot get stat from {} using JMX", getNamenodeDesc(), e);
}
}`
##########
File path:
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-rbf/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/federation/metrics/RBFMetrics.java
##########
@@ -165,11 +172,46 @@ public RBFMetrics(Router router) throws IOException {
// Initialize the cache for the DN reports
Configuration conf = router.getConfig();
- this.timeOut = conf.getTimeDuration(RBFConfigKeys.DN_REPORT_TIME_OUT,
- RBFConfigKeys.DN_REPORT_TIME_OUT_MS_DEFAULT, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
this.topTokenRealOwners = conf.getInt(
RBFConfigKeys.DFS_ROUTER_METRICS_TOP_NUM_TOKEN_OWNERS_KEY,
RBFConfigKeys.DFS_ROUTER_METRICS_TOP_NUM_TOKEN_OWNERS_KEY_DEFAULT);
+ // Initialize the cache for the DN reports
+ this.dnReportTimeOut = conf.getTimeDuration(
+ RBFConfigKeys.DN_REPORT_TIME_OUT,
+ RBFConfigKeys.DN_REPORT_TIME_OUT_MS_DEFAULT, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
+ long dnCacheExpire = conf.getTimeDuration(
+ RBFConfigKeys.DN_REPORT_CACHE_EXPIRE,
+ RBFConfigKeys.DN_REPORT_CACHE_EXPIRE_MS_DEFAULT,
TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
+ this.dnCache = CacheBuilder.newBuilder()
Review comment:
> RouterRpcServer has a similar cache, can we use that?
Yes we can use it.
NamesystemMetrics and NamenodeInfoMetrics will be stored in StateStore by
NamenodeBeanMetrics. It does not need to be stored, right? Is it better for us
to cache it in RBFMetrics.
```
private void updateJMXParameters(
String address, NamenodeStatusReport report) {
try {
// TODO part of this should be moved to its own utility
getFsNamesystemMetrics(address, report);
getNamenodeInfoMetrics(address, report);
} catch (Exception e) {
LOG.error("Cannot get stat from {} using JMX", getNamenodeDesc(), e);
}
}
```
##########
File path:
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs-rbf/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/federation/metrics/RBFMetrics.java
##########
@@ -165,11 +172,46 @@ public RBFMetrics(Router router) throws IOException {
// Initialize the cache for the DN reports
Configuration conf = router.getConfig();
- this.timeOut = conf.getTimeDuration(RBFConfigKeys.DN_REPORT_TIME_OUT,
- RBFConfigKeys.DN_REPORT_TIME_OUT_MS_DEFAULT, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
this.topTokenRealOwners = conf.getInt(
RBFConfigKeys.DFS_ROUTER_METRICS_TOP_NUM_TOKEN_OWNERS_KEY,
RBFConfigKeys.DFS_ROUTER_METRICS_TOP_NUM_TOKEN_OWNERS_KEY_DEFAULT);
+ // Initialize the cache for the DN reports
+ this.dnReportTimeOut = conf.getTimeDuration(
+ RBFConfigKeys.DN_REPORT_TIME_OUT,
+ RBFConfigKeys.DN_REPORT_TIME_OUT_MS_DEFAULT, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
+ long dnCacheExpire = conf.getTimeDuration(
+ RBFConfigKeys.DN_REPORT_CACHE_EXPIRE,
+ RBFConfigKeys.DN_REPORT_CACHE_EXPIRE_MS_DEFAULT,
TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
+ this.dnCache = CacheBuilder.newBuilder()
Review comment:
Yes,They should use the same dncache. In addition, I want to extract
NamesystemMetrics and NameNodeInfoMetrics into RBFMetrics. I don't think they
should be serialized to StateStore and then de-serialized to be used by
RBFMetrics.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
