[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7878?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13167156#comment-13167156
 ] 

Steve Loughran commented on HADOOP-7878:
----------------------------------------

Because I believe the javadocs are a false alarm, I am +1 to putting into trunk 
and 0.23
                
> Regression HADOOP-7777 switch changes too clever for the StaticMapping
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-7878
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-7878
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: util
>    Affects Versions: 0.23.0, 0.24.0
>            Reporter: Steve Loughran
>            Assignee: Steve Loughran
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: regression
>         Attachments: HADOOP-7878.patch, HADOOP-7878.patch
>
>   Original Estimate: 0.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0.5h
>
> This doesn't show up until you apply the HDFS-2492 patch, but the attempt to 
> make the {{StaticMapping}} topology clever by deciding if it is single rack 
> or multi rack based on its rack->node mapping breaks the HDFS 
> {{TestBlocksWithNotEnoughRacks}} test. Why? Because the racks go in after the 
> switch topology is cached by the {{BlockManager}}, which assumes the system 
> is always single-switch.
> Fix: default to assuming multi-switch; remove the intelligence, add a setter 
> for anyone who really wants to simulate single-switch racks. 
> Test: verify that a newly created simple mapping is multi switch

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to