symious commented on pull request #3704: URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/3704#issuecomment-991888320
@tasanuma Sorry for the late reply. > If this feature is similar to ECN, this ticket would be better to implement dfs.pipeline.reply_slownode_in_pipeline_ack.enable. Or do you think dfs.client.mark.slownode.as.badnode is better? Since it's similar to ECN, I think it's reasonable to set on the server side. Another problem I was thinking is the configuration of "dfs.client.mark.slownode.as.badnode.threshold", this configuration seems more related to the choice of Clients, it might be a little rigid to set a default value on server side. Should I leave this configuration on client side? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
