[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-18193?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot updated HADOOP-18193:
------------------------------------
    Labels: pull-request-available  (was: )

> Support nested mount points in INodeTree
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-18193
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-18193
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: viewfs
>    Affects Versions: 2.10.0
>            Reporter: Lei Yang
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Defining following client mount table config is not supported in  INodeTree 
> and will throw FileAlreadyExistsException
> fs.viewfs.mounttable.link./foo/bar=hdfs://nn1/foo/bar
> fs.viewfs.mounttable.link./foo=hdfs://nn02/foo
>  
> INodeTree has 2 methods that need change to support nested mount points.
> createLink(..): build INodeTree during fs init.
> resolve(..): resolve path in INodeTree with viewfs apis.
>  
> ViewFileSystem and ViewFs referes INodeTree.resolve(..) to resolve path to 
> specific mount point. No changes are expected in both classes. However, we 
> need to support existing use cases and make sure no regression.
>  
> AC:
>  # INodeTree.createlink should support creating nested mount 
> points.(INodeTree is constructed during fs init)
>  # INodeTree.resolve should support resolve path based on nested mount 
> points. (INodeTree.resolve is used in viewfs apis)
>  # No regression in existing ViewFileSystem and ViewFs apis.
>  # Ensure some important apis are not broken with nested mount points. 
> (Rename, getContentSummary, listStatus...)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to