[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17726?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Samrat Deb updated HADOOP-17726:
--------------------------------
    Description: 
 

As part of removing guava dependencies  HADOOP-17115, HADOOP-17721, 
HADOOP-17722 and HADOOP-17720 are fixed,

Currently the code call util function to create HashSet and TreeSet in the repo 
. These function calls dont have much importance as it is calling internally 
new HashSet<> / new TreeSet<> from java.utils 

This task is to clean up all the function calls to create sets which is 
redundant 

  was:
As per the guidelines provided by Guava Sets#newHashSet() and 
Sets#newTreeSet(), we should get rid of them and use newHashSet<>() and 
newTreeSet<>() directly.

Once HADOOP-17115, HADOOP-17721, HADOOP-17722 and HADOOP-17720 are fixed, 
please feel free to take this up.


> Replace Sets#newHashSet() and newTreeSet() with constructors directly
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-17726
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-17726
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 3.3.4
>            Reporter: Viraj Jasani
>            Assignee: Samrat Deb
>            Priority: Trivial
>              Labels: beginner, beginner-friendly, newbie
>
>  
> As part of removing guava dependencies  HADOOP-17115, HADOOP-17721, 
> HADOOP-17722 and HADOOP-17720 are fixed,
> Currently the code call util function to create HashSet and TreeSet in the 
> repo . These function calls dont have much importance as it is calling 
> internally new HashSet<> / new TreeSet<> from java.utils 
> This task is to clean up all the function calls to create sets which is 
> redundant 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to