Hexiaoqiao commented on code in PR #4407:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/4407#discussion_r891245808
##########
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/datanode/IncrementalBlockReportManager.java:
##########
@@ -251,12 +251,20 @@ synchronized void addRDBI(ReceivedDeletedBlockInfo rdbi,
DatanodeStorage storage) {
// Make sure another entry for the same block is first removed.
// There may only be one such entry.
+ ReceivedDeletedBlockInfo removedInfo = null;
for (PerStorageIBR perStorage : pendingIBRs.values()) {
- if (perStorage.remove(rdbi.getBlock()) != null) {
+ removedInfo = perStorage.remove(rdbi.getBlock());
+ if (removedInfo != null) {
break;
}
}
- getPerStorageIBR(storage).put(rdbi);
+ if (removedInfo != null &&
Review Comment:
My first feeling is `pendingIBRs` should keep the freshest `rdbis` set to
report NameNode. But after changes, it will be not the fresh data and also
inconsistence with block data on Storage, right?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
