[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13144?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17567393#comment-17567393
 ] 

Íñigo Goiri commented on HADOOP-13144:
--------------------------------------

There were no voices against for the latest PR and this has been tested 
extensively in multiple production deployments so I went ahead and merged PR 
4542 into trunk
This was a pretty long-standing change (back to 2016) and many people involved 
in the process.
Thank you everybody!

Merged PR 4542 into trunk.

> Enhancing IPC client throughput via multiple connections per user
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-13144
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13144
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: ipc
>            Reporter: Jason Kace
>            Assignee: Íñigo Goiri
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>         Attachments: HADOOP-13144-performance.patch, HADOOP-13144.000.patch, 
> HADOOP-13144.001.patch, HADOOP-13144.002.patch, HADOOP-13144.003.patch, 
> HADOOP-13144_overload_enhancement.patch
>
>          Time Spent: 1.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The generic IPC client ({{org.apache.hadoop.ipc.Client}}) utilizes a single 
> connection thread for each {{ConnectionId}}.  The {{ConnectionId}} is unique 
> to the connection's remote address, ticket and protocol.  Each ConnectionId 
> is 1:1 mapped to a connection thread by the client via a map cache.
> The result is to serialize all IPC read/write activity through a single 
> thread for a each user/ticket + address.  If a single user makes repeated 
> calls (1k-100k/sec) to the same destination, the IPC client becomes a 
> bottleneck.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to