snmvaughan opened a new pull request, #4834:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/4834

   ### Description of PR
   
   When the nnId is not provided to the WebHDFSClient, the request uses null to 
generate a URI using a host name of "null" to construct a DFSClient instance.  
In environments where the host name "null" doesn't resolve, the test passes due 
to the unresolvable name.  If the host name "null" does resolve, then this 
results in repeated attempts through the retry mechanism, eventually causing a 
timeout and a failed test result.
   
   This change make the parameter a precondition for constructing the 
DFSClient, which throws an exception, rejecting the request, and return the 
expected 400 status code.
   
   Make a non-null nnId a precondition for creating a DFSClient.
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   
   The patch was tested using both Maven Surefire and an IDE to demonstrate 
that the expected 400 status code was returned when the parameter was missing.
   
   ### For code changes:
   
   - [X] Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id 
(e.g. 'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...')?
   - [ ] Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the 
endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation?
   - [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies 
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)?
   - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the `LICENSE`, `LICENSE-binary`, 
`NOTICE-binary` files?
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to