[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8037?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Giridharan Kesavan updated HADOOP-8037:
---------------------------------------
Attachment: hadoop-8037.patch
this patch takes care of preserving the architecture specific lib directories
in case of bin-tar.gz and also takes care of retaining the symlinks for the so
files in case of the rpm's
> Binary tarball does not preserve platform info for native builds, and fails
> to provide needed symlinks for libhadoop.so
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-8037
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8037
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: build
> Affects Versions: 1.0.1
> Reporter: Matt Foley
> Assignee: Giridharan Kesavan
> Attachments: hadoop-8037.patch
>
>
> The source tarball uses "package" ant target, which includes both sets of
> native builds (32 and 64 bit libraries), under subdirectories that are named
> for the supported platform, so you can tell what they are.
> The binary tarball uses the "bin-package" ant target, which projects both
> sets of native builds into a single directory, stripping out the platform
> names from the directory paths. Since the native built libraries have
> identical names, only one of each survives the process. Afterward, there is
> no way to know whether they are intended for 32 or 64 bit environments.
> It seems to be done this way as a step toward building the rpm and deb
> artifacts. But the rpms and debs are self-identifying as to the platform
> they were built for, and contain only one set of libs each, while the binary
> tarball isn't. The binary tarball should have the same platform-specific
> subdirectories that the full tarball does; but this means that the rpm and
> deb builds have to be more careful about include/exclude specs for what goes
> into those artifacts.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
