steveloughran opened a new pull request, #4996:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/4996

   
   The option protobuf.scope defines whether the protobuf 2.5.0 dependency is 
marked as provided or not.
   
   * all declarations except those in yarn-csi are updated
   * those modules which don't compile without their own explicit import 
(hadoop-hdfs-client, hadoop-hdfs-rbf)
   
   It's actually interesting to see where/how that compile fails
   
   hadoop-hdfs-client: ClientNamenodeProtocolTranslatorPB 
hadoop-hdfs-rbf:RouterAdminProtocolTranslatorPB
   
   both with "class file for com.google.protobuf.ServiceException not found", 
even though *neither class uses it*
   
   what they do have is references to ProtobufHelper.getRemoteException(), 
which is overloaded to both the shaded ServiceException and the original one
   
   Hypothesis: the javac overload resolution needs to look at the entire class 
hierarchy before it can decide which one to use.
   
   Proposed: add a new method
    ioe extractException(org.apache.hadoop.thirdparty.protobuf.ServiceException)
   and move our own code to it. Without the overloading the classes should not 
be needed
   
   Change-Id: I70354abfe3f1fdc03c418dac88e60f8cc4929a33
   
   <!--
     Thanks for sending a pull request!
       1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/How+To+Contribute
       2. Make sure your PR title starts with JIRA issue id, e.g., 
'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...'.
   -->
   
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   
   local compile, now looking at yetus runs
   
   
   ### For code changes:
   
   - [ ] Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id 
(e.g. 'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...')?
   - [ ] Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the 
endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation?
   - [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies 
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)?
   - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the `LICENSE`, `LICENSE-binary`, 
`NOTICE-binary` files?
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to