virajjasani commented on code in PR #5432:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/5432#discussion_r1120335520


##########
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/datanode/fsdataset/impl/TestFsDatasetImpl.java:
##########
@@ -1101,15 +1099,11 @@ public void testReportBadBlocks() throws Exception {
 
       block = DFSTestUtil.getFirstBlock(fs, filePath);
       // Test for the overloaded method reportBadBlocks
-      dataNode.reportBadBlocks(block, dataNode.getFSDataset()
-          .getFsVolumeReferences().get(0));
-      Thread.sleep(3000);
-      BlockManagerTestUtil.updateState(cluster.getNamesystem()
-          .getBlockManager());
-      // Verify the bad block has been reported to namenode
-      Assert.assertEquals(1, 
cluster.getNamesystem().getCorruptReplicaBlocks());
-    } finally {
-      cluster.shutdown();
+      dataNode.reportBadBlocks(block, 
dataNode.getFSDataset().getFsVolumeReferences().get(0));
+      DataNodeTestUtils.triggerHeartbeat(dataNode);

Review Comment:
   Correct, it accounts for an internal wait to ensure namenode receives 
heartbeat by that time.
   That's what I was referring to in previous comment, whether that internal 
wait needs any improvement but usually we haven't seen flakes with it. And it 
has multiple usages, hence we should be good IMO.
   
   The way I am able to reproduce failure in debug mode without patch for this 
test, I am no longer able to reproduce test failure with the patch changes.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to