xinglin opened a new pull request, #5803: URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/5803
### Description of PR In [HDFS-17030](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17030), we introduced an ExecutorService, to submit getHAServiceState() requests. We constructed the ExecutorService directly from a basic ThreadPoolExecutor, without setting _allowCoreThreadTimeOut_ to true. Then, the core thread will be kept up and running even when the main thread exits. To fix it, one could set _allowCoreThreadTimeOut_ to true. However, in this PR, we decide to directly use an existing executorService implementation (BlockingThreadPoolExecutorService) in hadoop instead. It takes care of setting allowCoreThreadTimeOut and also allows setting the prefix for thread names. ``` private final ExecutorService nnProbingThreadPool = new ThreadPoolExecutor(1, 4, 1L, TimeUnit.MINUTES, new ArrayBlockingQueue<Runnable>(1024)); ``` A second minor issue is we did not shutdown the executorService in close(). It is a minor issue as close() will only be called when the garbage collector starts to reclaim an ObserverReadProxyProvider object, not when there is no reference to the ObserverReadProxyProvider object. The time between when an ObserverReadProxyProvider becomes dereferenced and when the garage collector actually starts to reclaim that object is out of control/under-defined (unless the program is shutdown with an explicit System.exit(1)). ### How was this patch tested? ``` ~/p/h/t/h/hadoop-hdfs (HDFS-17067)> mvn test -Dtest="TestObserverReadProxyProvider" [INFO] Running org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.ha.TestObserverReadProxyProvider [INFO] Tests run: 16, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 7.965 s - in org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.ha.TestObserverReadProxyProvider [INFO] [INFO] Results: [INFO] [INFO] Tests run: 16, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0 ``` ### For code changes: - [ ] Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id (e.g. 'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...')? - [ ] Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation? - [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)? - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the `LICENSE`, `LICENSE-binary`, `NOTICE-binary` files? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
