[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-19221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17864776#comment-17864776
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on HADOOP-19221:
-----------------------------------------

steveloughran opened a new pull request, #6938:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/6938

   
   Adds custom set of content providers in UploadContentProviders which
   * restart on failures
   * do not copy buffers/byte buffers into new private byte arrays, so avoid 
exacerbating memory problems.
   
   org.apache.hadoop.fs.store.ByteBufferInputStream has been pulled out of 
org.apache.hadoop.fs.store.DataBlocks to assist.
   
   CommitOperations has been wired up for this; S3ABlockOutputStream will 
follow.
   
   TODO
   * Maybe collect statistics on restarts
   * Improve handling of interrupted exceptions raised while waiting for block 
uploads to complete when spark wants to abort a speculative task.
   
   Change-Id: I8c5f73978e542147de76462206da5df1494b4912
   
   <!--
     Thanks for sending a pull request!
       1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/How+To+Contribute
       2. Make sure your PR title starts with JIRA issue id, e.g., 
'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...'.
   -->
   
   ### Description of PR
   
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   
   Needs new tests. I cannot think of a realistic way to inject failure 
conditions
   into the SDK other than having a fault injecting HttpClient implementation 
and
   that would be complicated.
   
   ### For code changes:
   
   - [ ] Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id 
(e.g. 'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...')?
   - [ ] Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the 
endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation?
   - [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies 
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)?
   - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the `LICENSE`, `LICENSE-binary`, 
`NOTICE-binary` files?
   
   




> S3A: Unable to recover from failure of multipart block upload attempt
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-19221
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-19221
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>          Components: fs/s3
>    Affects Versions: 3.4.0
>            Reporter: Steve Loughran
>            Assignee: Steve Loughran
>            Priority: Major
>
> If a multipart PUT request fails for some reason (e.g. networrk error) then 
> all subsequent retry attempts fail with a 400 Response and ErrorCode 
> RequestTimeout .
> {code}
> Your socket connection to the server was not read from or written to within 
> the timeout period. Idle connections will be closed. (Service: Amazon S3; 
> Status Code: 400; Error Code: RequestTimeout; Request ID:; S3 Extended 
> Request ID:
> {code}
> The list of supporessed exceptions contains the root cause (the initial 
> failure was a 500); all retries failed to upload properly from the source 
> input stream {{RequestBody.fromInputStream(fileStream, size)}}.
> Hypothesis: the mark/reset stuff doesn't work for input streams. On the v1 
> sdk we would build a multipart block upload request passing in (file, offset, 
> length), the way we are now doing this doesn't recover.
> probably fixable by providing our own {{ContentStreamProvider}} 
> implementations for
> # file + offset + length
> # bytebuffer
> # byte array
> The sdk does have explicit support for the memory ones, but they copy the 
> data blocks first. we don't want that as it would double the memory 
> requirements of active blocks.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to