pan3793 opened a new pull request, #7227:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/7227

   <!--
     Thanks for sending a pull request!
       1. If this is your first time, please read our contributor guidelines: 
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/HADOOP/How+To+Contribute
       2. Make sure your PR title starts with JIRA issue id, e.g., 
'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...'.
   -->
   
   ### Description of PR
   
   I saw the test 
`TestAbstractYarnScheduler.testGetRunningContainersToKill[FAIR]` fails 
occasionally
   
   ```
   Error:  
org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.TestAbstractYarnScheduler.testGetRunningContainersToKill[FAIR]
 -- Time elapsed: 0.016 s <<< FAILURE!
   java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<[OPPORTUNISTIC1, OPPORTUNISTIC0, 
GUARANTEED1, GUARANTEED0, AM1, AM0]> but was:<[OPPORTUNISTIC0, OPPORTUNISTIC1, 
GUARANTEED1, GUARANTEED0, AM1, AM0]>
        at org.junit.Assert.fail(Assert.java:89)
        at org.junit.Assert.failNotEquals(Assert.java:835)
        at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:120)
        at org.junit.Assert.assertEquals(Assert.java:146)
        at 
org.apache.hadoop.yarn.server.resourcemanager.scheduler.TestAbstractYarnScheduler.testGetRunningContainersToKill(TestAbstractYarnScheduler.java:1583)
   ...
   ```
   this is likely due to the two `System.currentTimeMillis()` return same value.
   
   > Returns the current time in milliseconds. Note that while the unit of time 
of the return value is a millisecond, the granularity of the value depends on 
the underlying operating system and may be larger. For example, many operating 
systems measure time in units of tens of milliseconds.
   
   ### How was this patch tested?
   
   Run the modified test locally multi times.
   
   ### For code changes:
   
   - [ ] Does the title or this PR starts with the corresponding JIRA issue id 
(e.g. 'HADOOP-17799. Your PR title ...')?
   - [ ] Object storage: have the integration tests been executed and the 
endpoint declared according to the connector-specific documentation?
   - [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies 
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)?
   - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the `LICENSE`, `LICENSE-binary`, 
`NOTICE-binary` files?
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to