[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-19450?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17929590#comment-17929590
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on HADOOP-19450:
-----------------------------------------

bhattmanish98 commented on code in PR #7364:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/7364#discussion_r1967099261


##########
hadoop-tools/hadoop-azure/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/azurebfs/AbstractAbfsIntegrationTest.java:
##########
@@ -733,4 +737,53 @@ protected void checkFuturesForExceptions(List<Future<?>> 
futures, int exceptionV
     }
     assertEquals(exceptionCaught, exceptionVal);
   }
+
+  /**
+   * Assumes that recovery through client transaction ID is enabled.
+   * Namespace is enabled for the given AzureBlobFileSystem.
+   * Service type is DFS.
+   * Assumes that the client transaction ID is enabled in the configuration.
+   *
+   * @param fs the AzureBlobFileSystem instance to check
+   * @throws AzureBlobFileSystemException in case of an error
+   */
+  protected void assumeRecoveryThroughClientTransactionID(
+      AzureBlobFileSystem fs, boolean isCreate)
+      throws AzureBlobFileSystemException {
+    // Assumes that recovery through client transaction ID is enabled.
+    Assume.assumeTrue(getConfiguration().getIsClientTransactionIdEnabled());
+    // Assumes that service type is DFS.
+    assumeDfsServiceType();
+    // Assumes that namespace is enabled for the given AzureBlobFileSystem.
+    Assume.assumeTrue(

Review Comment:
   Taken!



##########
hadoop-tools/hadoop-azure/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/fs/azurebfs/AbstractAbfsIntegrationTest.java:
##########
@@ -733,4 +737,53 @@ protected void checkFuturesForExceptions(List<Future<?>> 
futures, int exceptionV
     }
     assertEquals(exceptionCaught, exceptionVal);
   }
+
+  /**
+   * Assumes that recovery through client transaction ID is enabled.
+   * Namespace is enabled for the given AzureBlobFileSystem.
+   * Service type is DFS.
+   * Assumes that the client transaction ID is enabled in the configuration.
+   *
+   * @param fs the AzureBlobFileSystem instance to check
+   * @throws AzureBlobFileSystemException in case of an error
+   */
+  protected void assumeRecoveryThroughClientTransactionID(
+      AzureBlobFileSystem fs, boolean isCreate)

Review Comment:
   Taken!





> [ABFS] Rename/Create path idempotency client-level resolution
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-19450
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-19450
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: fs/azure
>    Affects Versions: 3.5.0
>            Reporter: Manish Bhatt
>            Assignee: Manish Bhatt
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> CreatePath and RenamePath APIs are idempotent as subsequent retries on same 
> resource don’t change the server state. However, when client experiences 
> connection break on the CreatePath and the RenamePath APIs, client cannot 
> make sense if the request is accepted by the server or not. 
> On connection failure, the client retries the request. The server might 
> return 404 (sourceNotFound) in case of RenamePath API and 409 
> (pathAlreadyExists) in case of CreatePath (overwrite=false) API. Now the 
> client doesn’t have a path forward. Reason being, in case of CreatePath, 
> client doesn’t know if the path was created on the original request or the 
> path was already there for some other request, in case of RenamePath, client 
> doesn’t know if the source was removed because of the original-try or it was 
> not there on the first place. 
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to