[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-19574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18024224#comment-18024224
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on HADOOP-19574:
-----------------------------------------

stoty commented on code in PR #7892:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/7892#discussion_r2397492789


##########
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-auth/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/security/authentication/util/SubjectUtil.java:
##########
@@ -71,6 +78,23 @@ private static MethodHandle lookupCallAs() {
     }
   }
 
+  private static boolean checkThreadInheritsSubject() {

Review Comment:
   Added javadoc



##########
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/util/Shell.java:
##########
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
 import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicBoolean;
 
 import org.apache.hadoop.classification.VisibleForTesting;
+import org.apache.hadoop.util.concurrent.SubjectInheritingThread;

Review Comment:
   Fixed





> Restore Subject propagation semantics for Java 22+
> --------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-19574
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-19574
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Istvan Toth
>            Assignee: Istvan Toth
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>
> Java 22 breaks Subject propagation for new Threads (when SecurityManager is 
> not enabled).
> Previously, the Subject set by Subject.doAs() / Subject.callAs() 
> automatically propagated to any new Threads created (via new Thread(), not 
> Executors).
> With JDK22, this is no longer the case, new Threads do NOT inherit the 
> Subject.
> As Hadoop heavily relies on the original behavior, we somehow need to solve 
> this problem.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to