[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13398269#comment-13398269
 ] 

Konstantin Shvachko commented on HADOOP-8468:
---------------------------------------------

> 3rd on local node of 2nd

How so?

Junping try to rewrite the policy I stated earlier using your terms for 4-level 
topology with node-groups as the third level, and you will see many words 
change. If you put it in terms when virtual nodes are added as the fourth 
level, then you don't need to change a word in the old policy. I thought it's a 
good thing to keep old policies consistent with new use cases. Confirms (1) 
that it's a good policy, and (2) that it's a good design.

> Agree. That's what I try to do previously also.

What changed your mind? Sounds like the right direction to me.
                
> Umbrella of enhancements to support different failure and locality topologies
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-8468
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8468
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: ha, io
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.0, 2.0.0-alpha
>            Reporter: Junping Du
>            Assignee: Junping Du
>            Priority: Critical
>         Attachments: HADOOP-8468-total-v3.patch, HADOOP-8468-total.patch, 
> Proposal for enchanced failure and locality topologies (revised-1.0).pdf, 
> Proposal for enchanced failure and locality topologies.pdf
>
>
> The current hadoop network topology (described in some previous issues like: 
> Hadoop-692) works well in classic three-tiers network when it comes out. 
> However, it does not take into account other failure models or changes in the 
> infrastructure that can affect network bandwidth efficiency like: 
> virtualization. 
> Virtualized platform has following genes that shouldn't been ignored by 
> hadoop topology in scheduling tasks, placing replica, do balancing or 
> fetching block for reading: 
> 1. VMs on the same physical host are affected by the same hardware failure. 
> In order to match the reliability of a physical deployment, replication of 
> data across two virtual machines on the same host should be avoided.
> 2. The network between VMs on the same physical host has higher throughput 
> and lower latency and does not consume any physical switch bandwidth.
> Thus, we propose to make hadoop network topology extend-able and introduce a 
> new level in the hierarchical topology, a node group level, which maps well 
> onto an infrastructure that is based on a virtualized environment.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to