[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9151?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13535196#comment-13535196
 ] 

Todd Lipcon commented on HADOOP-9151:
-------------------------------------

bq. Todd, not sure what you mean here. From what I know 0.23.x does not have 
any of the protobuf changes or all the other changes that have happened in ipc 
right?

Sorry, my mistake.

Still, 2.x has been out for quite some time now, and I don't think it's a good 
idea to break compatibility for what amounts to a surface-level cleanup. 
Despite the "alpha" label, there are a lot of people using it, and breaking the 
compat should require a really good reason.

Certainly it's a shame to have some non-PB items in there, but they're very 
simple serializations of strings. I've implemented a simple client for it in 
C++ and it wasn't at all difficult to deal with the few places where writables 
snuck into the header.
                
> Include RPC error info in RpcResponseHeader instead of sending it separately
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-9151
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9151
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Sanjay Radia
>            Assignee: Sanjay Radia
>         Attachments: HADOOP-9151.patch
>
>


--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to