[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9468?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13628164#comment-13628164
]
Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-9468:
-----------------------------------
{color:red}-1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12578044/0001-HADOOP-9468.-Not-embedding-JVM-library-paths-in-FUSE.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:red}-1 tests included{color}. The patch doesn't appear to include
any new or modified tests.
Please justify why no new tests are needed for this
patch.
Also please list what manual steps were performed to
verify this patch.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. The javadoc tool did not generate any
warning messages.
{color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}. The patch built with
eclipse:eclipse.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs.
{color:green}+1 contrib tests{color}. The patch passed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/2440//testReport/
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/2440//console
This message is automatically generated.
> JVM path embedded in fuse binaries
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-9468
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9468
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Sean Mackrory
> Assignee: Sean Mackrory
> Attachments:
> 0001-HADOOP-9468.-Not-embedding-JVM-library-paths-in-FUSE.patch
>
>
> When the FUSE binaries are built, the paths to libraries in the JVMs is
> embedded in the RPATH so that they can be found at run-time. From an Apache
> Bigtop perspective, this is not sufficient because the software may be run on
> a machine configured very differently from the one on which they were built -
> so a wrapper sets LD_LIBRARY_PATH according to JAVA_HOME. I recently saw an
> issue where the original JVM path existed, causing LD_LIBRARY_PATH to be
> ignored in favor of the RPATH, but it was not the JVM intended for running
> Hadoop (not JAVA_HOME), and this caused problems.
> I'm told that setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH is standard practice before using the
> fuse program anyway, and if that's the case, I think removing the RPATH from
> the binaries is a good idea.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
