[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9517?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Karthik Kambatla updated HADOOP-9517:
-------------------------------------
Attachment: hadoop-9517-v2.patch
Updated the patch to:
# differentiate between the kinds of file formats
# list the kinds of HDFS metadata upgrades
# include the policy proposal for proto files
The policies being proposed (from comments in the JIRA) are explicitly labelled
(Proposal)
At this point, it would be great to make sure the document
# captures all the items that affect compatibility
# the policies for the not-newly-proposed ones are accurate
# the newly proposed policies are reasonable
# improve the presentation, if need be
Once done with the above, it might be a good idea to get this in and address
items with no policies in subsequent JIRAs or sub-tasks to make sure we discuss
them in isolation and detail. Thoughts?
> Document Hadoop Compatibility
> -----------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-9517
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9517
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: documentation
> Reporter: Arun C Murthy
> Assignee: Karthik Kambatla
> Attachments: hadoop-9517.patch, hadoop-9517.patch, hadoop-9517.patch,
> hadoop-9517.patch, hadoop-9517-proposal-v1.patch,
> hadoop-9517-proposal-v1.patch, hadoop-9517-v2.patch
>
>
> As we get ready to call hadoop-2 stable we need to better define 'Hadoop
> Compatibility'.
> http://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Compatibility is a start, let's document
> requirements clearly and completely.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
