[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10244?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13876857#comment-13876857
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-10244:
------------------------------------

{color:green}+1 overall{color}.  Here are the results of testing the latest 
attachment 
  http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12624011/10244.patch
  against trunk revision .

    {color:green}+1 @author{color}.  The patch does not contain any @author 
tags.

    {color:green}+1 tests included{color}.  The patch appears to include 1 new 
or modified test files.

    {color:green}+1 javac{color}.  The applied patch does not increase the 
total number of javac compiler warnings.

    {color:green}+1 javadoc{color}.  The javadoc tool did not generate any 
warning messages.

    {color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}.  The patch built with 
eclipse:eclipse.

    {color:green}+1 findbugs{color}.  The patch does not introduce any new 
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.

    {color:green}+1 release audit{color}.  The applied patch does not increase 
the total number of release audit warnings.

    {color:green}+1 core tests{color}.  The patch passed unit tests in 
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common.

    {color:green}+1 contrib tests{color}.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/3448//testReport/
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/3448//console

This message is automatically generated.

> TestKeyShell improperly tests the results of a Delete
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-10244
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10244
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: security
>            Reporter: Larry McCay
>            Assignee: Larry McCay
>         Attachments: 10244.patch
>
>
> The TestKeyShell.testKeySuccessfulKeyLifecycle test is supposed to ensure 
> that the deleted key is no longer in the results of a subsequent delete 
> command. Mistakenly, it is testing that it is STILL there.
> The delete command is actually working but the stdout capture should be reset 
> instead of flushed. Therefore, the test is picking up the existence of the 
> key name from the deletion message in the previous command.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)

Reply via email to