[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13942826#comment-13942826
]
Alejandro Abdelnur commented on HADOOP-10398:
---------------------------------------------
bq. But, we do see customers share or mount the same directories on flubber.
Well, just tell them they are shooting themselves in their feet. They should
not do that.
bq. like Robert Kanter mentioned above,
"oozie.service.AuthorizationService.security.enabled" and
"oozie.authentication.simple.anonymous.allowed" are not mutually exclusive from
oozie product point of view. When we allow anonymous request and enable
authorization at the same time, we are merely saying anonymous users can view
the web console or other job info, it's just we enforce only the owner and
admin can kill/modify a job. The "anonymous" config has more to do with viewing
oozie webconsole and the "authorization" config has more to do with who can
modify a job,
Are we dealing here with the special authentication handling based on
user-agent?
> KerberosAuthenticator failed to fall back to PseudoAuthenticator after
> HADOOP-10078
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-10398
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10398
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: security
> Reporter: Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze
> Assignee: Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze
> Attachments: a.txt, c10398_20140310.patch
>
>
> {code}
> //KerberosAuthenticator.java
> if (conn.getResponseCode() == HttpURLConnection.HTTP_OK) {
> LOG.debug("JDK performed authentication on our behalf.");
> // If the JDK already did the SPNEGO back-and-forth for
> // us, just pull out the token.
> AuthenticatedURL.extractToken(conn, token);
> return;
> } else ...
> {code}
> The problem of the code above is that HTTP_OK does not implies authentication
> completed. We should check if the token can be extracted successfully.
> This problem was reported by [~bowenzhangusa] in [this
> comment|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10078?focusedCommentId=13896823&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13896823]
> earlier.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)