[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13950607#comment-13950607
 ] 

Hudson commented on HADOOP-10442:
---------------------------------

FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-Yarn-trunk #523 (See 
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Yarn-trunk/523/])
HADOOP-10442. Group look-up can cause segmentation fault when certain JNI-based 
mapping module is used. (Kihwal Lee via jeagles) (jeagles: 
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/?root=Apache-SVN&view=rev&rev=1582451)
* /hadoop/common/trunk/hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/CHANGES.txt
* 
/hadoop/common/trunk/hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/main/native/src/org/apache/hadoop/security/hadoop_user_info.c


> Group look-up can cause segmentation fault when certain JNI-based mapping 
> module is used.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-10442
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10442
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.3.0, 2.4.0
>            Reporter: Kihwal Lee
>            Assignee: Kihwal Lee
>            Priority: Blocker
>             Fix For: 3.0.0, 2.4.0, 2.5.0
>
>         Attachments: HADOOP-10442.patch
>
>
> When JniBasedUnixGroupsNetgroupMapping or JniBasedUnixGroupsMapping is used, 
> we get segmentation fault very often. The same system ran 2.2 for months 
> without any problem, but as soon as upgrading to 2.3, it started crashing.  
> This resulted in multiple name node crashes per day.
> The server was running nslcd (nss-pam-ldapd-0.7.5-15.el6_3.2). We did not see 
> this problem on the servers running sssd. 
> There was one change in the C code and it modified the return code handling 
> after getgrouplist() call. If the function returns 0 or a negative value less 
> than -1, it will do realloc() instead of returning failure.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

Reply via email to