[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13983763#comment-13983763
]
Larry McCay commented on HADOOP-10433:
--------------------------------------
Hi [~andrew.wang] - I also thought that those types of providers would need to
be adapted by the KeyProvider implementation to always default the version -
assuming that the provider doesn't actually support versions. So, in that case
it would be be UUID@0. Current version would always be 0 or 1 - whatever makes
sense.
There are other systems that seem to have keyNames with UUIDs as the version. I
think that barbican uses this scheme. It would have to do something similar
within the KeyProvider implementation to adapt it to the API. Not sure whether
the UUID version can be used as the actual version.
> Key Management Server based on KeyProvider API
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-10433
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10433
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: security
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0
> Reporter: Alejandro Abdelnur
> Assignee: Alejandro Abdelnur
> Attachments: HADOOP-10433.patch, HADOOP-10433.patch,
> HADOOP-10433.patch, HADOOP-10433.patch, HADOOP-10433.patch,
> HADOOP-10433.patch, HADOOP-10433.patch, HadoopKMSDocsv2.pdf, KMS-doc.pdf
>
>
> (from HDFS-6134 proposal)
> Hadoop KMS is the gateway, for Hadoop and Hadoop clients, to the underlying
> KMS. It provides an interface that works with existing Hadoop security
> components (authenticatication, confidentiality).
> Hadoop KMS will be implemented leveraging the work being done in HADOOP-10141
> and HADOOP-10177.
> Hadoop KMS will provide an additional implementation of the Hadoop
> KeyProvider class. This implementation will be a client-server implementation.
> The client-server protocol will be secure:
> * Kerberos HTTP SPNEGO (authentication)
> * HTTPS for transport (confidentiality and integrity)
> * Hadoop ACLs (authorization)
> The Hadoop KMS implementation will not provide additional ACL to access
> encrypted files. For sophisticated access control requirements, HDFS ACLs
> (HDFS-4685) should be used.
> Basic key administration will be supported by the Hadoop KMS via the, already
> available, Hadoop KeyShell command line tool
> There are minor changes that must be done in Hadoop KeyProvider functionality:
> The KeyProvider contract, and the existing implementations, must be
> thread-safe
> KeyProvider API should have an API to generate the key material internally
> JavaKeyStoreProvider should use, if present, a password provided via
> configuration
> KeyProvider Option and Metadata should include a label (for easier
> cross-referencing)
> To avoid overloading the underlying KeyProvider implementation, the Hadoop
> KMS will cache keys using a TTL policy.
> Scalability and High Availability of the Hadoop KMS can achieved by running
> multiple instances behind a VIP/Load-Balancer. For High Availability, the
> underlying KeyProvider implementation used by the Hadoop KMS must be High
> Available.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
