[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9361?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14014184#comment-14014184
]
jay vyas commented on HADOOP-9361:
----------------------------------
Hi Andrew I can help to review it: it's an important part of the hcfs
initiative.
Possibly we could review it In person at Hadoop summit if you are going, as I
will be there for the week.
> Strictly define the expected behavior of filesystem APIs and write tests to
> verify compliance
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-9361
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-9361
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: fs, test
> Affects Versions: 3.0.0, 2.4.0
> Reporter: Steve Loughran
> Assignee: Steve Loughran
> Attachments: HADOOP-9361-001.patch, HADOOP-9361-002.patch,
> HADOOP-9361-003.patch, HADOOP-9361-004.patch, HADOOP-9361-005.patch,
> HADOOP-9361-006.patch, HADOOP-9361-007.patch, HADOOP-9361-008.patch,
> HADOOP-9361-009.patch, HADOOP-9361-011.patch, HADOOP-9361-012.patch,
> HADOOP-9361-013.patch
>
>
> {{FileSystem}} and {{FileContract}} aren't tested rigorously enough -while
> HDFS gets tested downstream, other filesystems, such as blobstore bindings,
> don't.
> The only tests that are common are those of {{FileSystemContractTestBase}},
> which HADOOP-9258 shows is incomplete.
> I propose
> # writing more tests which clarify expected behavior
> # testing operations in the interface being in their own JUnit4 test classes,
> instead of one big test suite.
> # Having each FS declare via a properties file what behaviors they offer,
> such as atomic-rename, atomic-delete, umask, immediate-consistency -test
> methods can downgrade to skipped test cases if a feature is missing.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
