[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10565?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14014893#comment-14014893
]
Hadoop QA commented on HADOOP-10565:
------------------------------------
{color:green}+1 overall{color}. Here are the results of testing the latest
attachment
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12647804/HADOOP-10565.patch
against trunk revision .
{color:green}+1 @author{color}. The patch does not contain any @author
tags.
{color:green}+1 tests included{color}. The patch appears to include 2 new
or modified test files.
{color:green}+1 javac{color}. The applied patch does not increase the
total number of javac compiler warnings.
{color:green}+1 javadoc{color}. There were no new javadoc warning messages.
{color:green}+1 eclipse:eclipse{color}. The patch built with
eclipse:eclipse.
{color:green}+1 findbugs{color}. The patch does not introduce any new
Findbugs (version 1.3.9) warnings.
{color:green}+1 release audit{color}. The applied patch does not increase
the total number of release audit warnings.
{color:green}+1 core tests{color}. The patch passed unit tests in
hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common.
{color:green}+1 contrib tests{color}. The patch passed contrib unit tests.
Test results:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/3990//testReport/
Console output:
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HADOOP-Build/3990//console
This message is automatically generated.
> Support IP ranges (CIDR) in proxyuser.hosts
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-10565
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10565
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: security
> Reporter: Benoy Antony
> Assignee: Benoy Antony
> Attachments: HADOOP-10565.patch, HADOOP-10565.patch
>
>
> In some use cases, there will be many hosts from which the user can
> impersonate.
> This requires specifying many ips in the XML configuration.
> It is cumbersome to specify and maintain long list of ips in proxyuser.hosts
> The problem can be solved if we enable proxyuser.hosts to accept ip ranges in
> CIDR format.
> In addition, the current ip authorization involve a liner scan of the ips and
> an attempt to do InetAddress.getByName() for each ip/host.
> It may be beneficial to group this functionality of ip authorization by
> looking up "ip addresses/host names/ip-ranges" into a separate class. This
> could be reused in other usecases which require similar functionality
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
